Integrity in the World of Work

Integrity in the World of Work
In the world of work, the word integrity is not just a matter of honesty, ethical and moral issues, that people don’t lie or don’t do immoral things. Integrity is also related to performance, an achievement of good results achieved by always upholding honesty and other moral values. The word integrity comes from the root of the word “integrated”, which means various parts of our character and skills play an active role in us, which is seen from our decisions and actions (Lee, on Zambrut International Journal). To be able to produce good performance in the workplace, one must have in himself abilities such as honest, brave, empowered, build good relationships, good at organizing themselves, organized, and well planned.
Integrity must be able to contribute to the improvement of life, and in the context of the world of work means improved performance. That means integrity is not only negative, just not to lie, not cheat, or not do things that are immoral. Integrity must also have a positive nature, which is doing something to produce something, with a moral quality in it. Self-integrity must encourage the achievement of good results from oneself, whether in the form of good performance or the achievement of good things in life. So the negative and positive traits must go together. As someone tries not to lie, not cheat (self-control), he must also do something to show good results or achievements. The first thing, which is negative, an act of understanding and self-control, then the minimum stage of the realization of integrity, the maximum stage is justu when the positive nature appears, in the form of good actions that produce something with good quality. It is generally assumed that the minimum stage in the form of avoidance (restraint and self-control) to do something bad is the main thing in terms of integrity and mandatory nature, while the maximum stage, an act of producing something of quality, is an expectation or appeal. But in connection with the world of work, then the maximum stage is not just an appeal or hope, but a demand, a necessity.
Thus, there are various personal traits and certain abilities that must be combined with honesty and various other positive attitudes to be able to produce what is called integrity. All of that will lead to success at work. So regarding competence in their fields is also part of integrity. Without competence, it is difficult to show integrity itself, while competence itself will be difficult to manifest good performance without being accompanied by parts of character, which encourage it to be able to achieve good results and in good ways (compare Simon, 2007; 2011).
Talking about integrity in the workplace cannot be separated from talking about competencies possessed by someone to be able to produce good performance in the workplace. The two things support each other. People are said to have more integrity, he is increasingly concerned about his competence; and conversely, people increasingly have good competence he also pay attention to his integrity. People who have good competence but do not have integrity, then the ability (competency) is good it can not produce good performance or work. Vice versa, people who have good integrity, but do not have good competence, also cannot be expected to produce good performance.
Career success and integrity go hand in hand. Someone who has integrity can show that they make ethical choices in their work lives every day. These people often come out victorious in the true sense of career competition. Those who have subordinates need to be more active in inspiring their subordinates. They actively promote integrity through their personal attitudes and actions, trust and commitment to the organization’s core values (Gauss, 2000). More clearly this was stated by Simons (2002), that integrity is a visible pattern in which there are similarities between words and works. Or in other words, the fact that a leader can be seen clearly when he does what he says. An important provision in terms of integrity is that in reality a leader keeps his promises, and shows the values that he always upholds.
Broadly speaking, knowledge is divided into two types namely Tacit Knowledge (implicit knowledge) and Explicit Knowledge (explicit knowledge), which can be described as follows: Knowledge is knowledge that is owned by someone and is very difficult to formalize, difficult to communicate or share with others . The understanding inherent in the individual’s knowledge is still subjective. knowledge possessed by these individuals can still be categorized as intuition and conjecture. This tactical knowledge is rooted in one’s actions and experiences, including idealism, values and emotions. Tacit knowledge is knowledge that is very personal and also very difficult to be formed. In addition, tacit knowledge is difficult to communicate or share with others.